Strong Kirchheimer vs James Tracy Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Kirchheimer vs J. Tracy

Strong Kirchheimer
USA
l
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
30
Age
23
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
-
622
C. Rank
781
375
Best Rank
668
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$8.2K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

James Tracy
USA
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
30
Age
23
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
-
622
C. Rank
781
375
Best Rank
668
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$8.2K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Kirchheimer 0 - 1 Tracy
They have played 2 sets in total, with Strong Kirchheimer winning 0 and James Tracy winning 2. The last match between James Tracy and Strong Kirchheimer was at the M15 South Bend, 25-06-2023, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with James Tracy getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kirchheimer | 0 |
| Tracy | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(F) M15 South Bend(06-25-23)
James Tracy
6
6
Strong Kirchheimer
1
2
S. Kirchheimer vs J. Tracy H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $8,150 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.69% (313-270) | Career Total W/L | 51.79% (29-27) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 1 | Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Kirchheimer vs J. Tracy Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Strong Kirchheimer has won 47.78% of points on their second serve, while James Tracy has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Strong Kirchheimer, in recent form, has won 43.75% of their opponent's second serve points, while James Tracy has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.35% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Strong Kirchheimer has saved 60.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas James Tracy has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Strong Kirchheimer has won 38.71% of matches played (W/L 24/38), with James Tracy winning 20.00% (W/L 1/4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Strong Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 74/61), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 174/153). James Tracy has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 19/15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 1/4).
- Player level: In the last year, Strong Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.14% of matches (W/L 13/22), where as James Tracy has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 20.00% of matches (W/L 1/4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Strong Kirchheimer winning 0 times and James Tracy being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Strong Kirchheimer winning 0 and James Tracy winning 2.
- The last match between Strong Kirchheimer and James Tracy was at the M15 South Bend, 25-06-2023, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with James Tracy getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Strong Kirchheimer has played against opponents with an average rank of 410.24 while James Tracy has played against players with an average rank of 561.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Strong Kirchheimer has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while James Tracy has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Strong Kirchheimer has converted 33.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and James Tracy has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Strong Kirchheimer vs James Tracy Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Kirchheimer vs J. Tracy H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 3 | Games Won | 12 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:27:0 | Average Match Time | 1:27:0 |
| 63% (29/46) | 1st Serve % | 61% (38/62) |
| 48% (14/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (26/38) |
| 47% (8/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 67% (16/24) |
| 0% (0/7) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 32% (20/62) | Return Points Win % | 52% (24/46) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Kirchheimer 50%, Tracy 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kirchheimer 47%, Tracy 51%.
Break Points Saved %: Kirchheimer 60%, Tracy 66%.
S. Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 1-6 7-6(5) | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(5) 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(3) 7-6(4) | ||
J. Tracy Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | ||

S. Kirchheimer vs J. Tracy Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.69% (313/270) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.79% (29/27) |
| 54.05% (728/619) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.59% (71/64) |
| 52.13% (6643/6100) | Games Win/Loss | 52.56% (668/603) |
| 53.21% (174/153) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.88% (19/15) |
| 54.81% (74/61) | Clay Win/Loss | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 53.72% (65/56) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52.94% (9/8) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 2025 | Aces Total | 90 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1071 | Total Double Faults | 122 |
| 1:28:13 | Average Match Time | 1:55:19 |
| 464.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 544.29 |
| 64% (21226/33011) | 1st Serve % | 65% (2607/4020) |
| 69% (14625/21226) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (1693/2607) |
| 52% (6100/11785) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (733/1413) |
| 39% (1253/3187) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (193/409) |
| 39% (12948/33623) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1647/3956) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43.54% (91/118) | Challenger W/L | 22.73% (5/17) |
| 59.89% (218/146) | Futures W/L | 70.59% (24/10) |
| 54% (309/574) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (28/55) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (82/169) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (4/11) |
| 44% (80/182) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (9/22) |
| 82% (329/271) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (30/24) |
| 17% (329/57) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (30/6) |
| 17% (254/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (26/5) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
07:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction04:05 PM 15/11/25
Prediction09:55 PM 14/11/25
Prediction01:30 AM 15/11/25
Prediction09:35 PM 14/11/25
Prediction12:00 AM 15/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
14 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Alexander Zverev vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
16:05
H2H 12-0
22:30
H2H 6-3
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico